|
Bio-Techne corporation
human/mouse/rat sox2 antibody Human/Mouse/Rat Sox2 Antibody, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/custom%40af2018%4042382726?v=Bio-Techne+corporation Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human/mouse/rat sox2 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Antibodies Inc
anti-sox2 antibody Anti Sox2 Antibody, supplied by Antibodies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/custom%40sox2-0100%4042432363?v=Antibodies+Inc Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-sox2 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
99/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
sox2 ![]() Sox2, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/pmc13352860-131-60-63?v=Miltenyi+Biotec Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sox2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Servicebio Inc
rabbit anti sox2 ![]() Rabbit Anti Sox2, supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/pm42320254-131-22-27?v=Servicebio+Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti sox2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Jackson Laboratory
sox2 creert2 114 ![]() Sox2 Creert2 114, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/pm42275232-47-0-2?v=Jackson+Laboratory Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sox2 creert2 114 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Cell Signaling Technology Inc
sox2 ![]() Sox2, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/pmc13052523-51-16-26?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sox2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
96/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novogene
sox2 activated lung tumors ![]() Sox2 Activated Lung Tumors, supplied by Novogene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/pmc13198274-569-3-15?v=Novogene Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sox2 activated lung tumors - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Musashi Engineering Inc
sox2 ![]() Sox2, supplied by Musashi Engineering Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/pm42151414-180-23-20?v=Musashi+Engineering+Inc Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sox2 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Jackson Laboratory
sox2 flox mice ![]() Sox2 Flox Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/us12618070-575-1-6?v=Jackson+Laboratory Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sox2 flox mice - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Jackson Laboratory
sox2 creer mice ![]() Sox2 Creer Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/sox2/pm42072344-54-11-14?v=Jackson+Laboratory Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sox2 creer mice - by Bioz Stars,
2026-08
86/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Article Title: Activation of the G-protein coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) reduces transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) activity and human iPSC-derived nociceptive neuron firing
doi: 10.1186/s13287-026-05174-3
Figure Lengend Snippet: Reprogramming of adult human dermal fibroblasts (HDFa) into induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) line BO-VC1. Reprogramming was performed using the Epi5 ™ Episomal iPSC Reprogramming Kit, enabling the generation of ( A ) transgene- and virus-free iPSC line BO-VC1. Successful generation of fibroblast-derived iPSCs was validated by immunocytochemical staining for the pluripotency markers ( B ) SOX2, C TRA 1–60, D OCT4, SSEA4 and E NANOG. Quantification of the generated iPSCs via flow cytometry revealed F 99.31% SSEA4/TRA1-60, G 97.43% SOX2/TRA1-60 and H 98.60% OCT3/4/TRA1-60 positive cells. I Quantification of the transcript levels of the stem cell markers NANOG , OCT4 , REX1 and SOX2 revealed significantly higher mRNA levels in iPSC line BO-VC1 compared to the HDFa control ( n = 3 different passages) Moreover, generated iPSCs were functionally validated by directed differentiation into all three germ layers. Subsequent immunocytochemical staining of the iPSCs before and after differentiation confirmed the expression of ( J–M ) meso-, N–Q endo- and R–U ectodermal lineage markers only in the respective differentiations. Scale bars: 50 μm. Data were tested for normal distribution using Shapiro-Wilk test. Means ± SEM (standard error of the mean) were statistically analyzed by a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. n = 3 (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001)
Article Snippet: Subsequently, cells were incubated in inside fix solution of the Inside Stain Kit (#130-090-477, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) for 20 min at RT and centrifuged at 200xg for 5 min. After washing in 500 μl PEB buffer and centrifugation at 200xg cells were stained with the nuclear stem cell markers OCT3/4 (1:50, #130-117-821, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and
Techniques: Virus, Derivative Assay, Staining, Generated, Flow Cytometry, Control, Expressing
Journal: Cell Reports Medicine
Article Title: An autochthonous CRISPR activation screening platform for characterizing tissue-specific oncogene selection
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102759
Figure Lengend Snippet: Sox2 activation accelerates lung tumor initiation and progression (A) Timeline of the Sox2 activation experiment. (B) Representative macroscopic images and corresponding computed tomography (CT) scans of non-targeted (NT) and Sox2-activated (sgSox2) PPKS lungs at 8 weeks. Scale bar, 1 cm. (C) Relative lung weights for NT and sgSox2 mice at 8 weeks ( n = 8 biological replicates/group). (D) CT voxel attenuation for NT and sgSox2 lungs at 8 weeks ( n = 11–12 biological replicates/group). (E) Histology, IHC (dCas9VP64 and Ki-67), and Alcian blue staining of NT and sgSox2 lungs at 8 weeks. Scale bars, 150 μm. (F) Quantification of dCas9VP64+ cells in NT and sgSox2 lungs at 8 weeks ( n = 8 biological replicates/group). (G) Quantification of Ki-67-positive cells in NT and sgSox2 lungs at 8 weeks ( n = 8 biological replicates/group). (H) Kaplan-Meier survival plot for NT (median survival 144 days) and sgSox2 (median survival 83 days) mice ( n = 6–7 biological replicates). Statistical significance for pairwise comparisons using Student’s two-tailed t test for bar graphs and log rank (Mantel-Cox) for survival. ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. Error bars indicate SEM. See also .
Article Snippet: For profiling of
Techniques: Activation Assay, Computed Tomography, Staining, Two Tailed Test
Journal: Cell Reports Medicine
Article Title: An autochthonous CRISPR activation screening platform for characterizing tissue-specific oncogene selection
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102759
Figure Lengend Snippet: Delineating Sox2-mediated transcriptomic reprogramming (A) Schematic of transcriptomic profiling ( n = 4 biological replicates). (B) Heatmap of all differentially expressed genes at survival endpoint (sgSox2 vs. NT). (C) Expression of Sox2 in Sox2-activated and control tumors ( n = 4 biological replicates). Error bars indicate SEM. (D) IHC of SOX2 in Sox2-activated and control lungs at 8 weeks. Scale bar, 150 μm. (E) Quantification of SOX2 IHC ( n = 4–5 biological replicates). Error bars indicate SEM. (F) Heatmap of LUSC- and LUAD-associated transcripts in Sox2-activated and control tumors. (G) Heatmap of transcripts associated with mucinous cancer and gastric metaplasia in Sox2-activated and control tumors ( n = 4 biological replicates). (H) IHC of NKX2-1, TFF1, and MUC5AC. Scale bar, 150 μm. (I) Quantification of NKX2-1, TFF1, and MUC5AC IHC at 8 weeks and survival endpoint (n = 4–5 biological replicates). EP, survival endpoint. (J) Volcano plot of mucin and gastric metaplasia genes in SOX2-high vs. -low KRAS-mutant human LUAD (TCGA-LUAD KRAS-mutant cohort, n = 89 cases). Statistical significance for pairwise comparisons using Student’s two-tailed t test for bar graphs and for multiple comparisons using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons correction. For differences in gene expression, adjusted p values ( q values) from DEseq2 were used. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. See also .
Article Snippet: For profiling of
Techniques: Expressing, Control, Mutagenesis, Two Tailed Test, Gene Expression